The Guide to Major Trusts 2025-26. DSC (Directory of Social Change)

Disinheritance ruling: daughter successfully challenges charitable legacies

Simon George | 28 July 2015 | Blogs

Red cardboard robot holds white broken heart - photo: Pexels.com

Today’s ruling by the Court of Appeal in favour of a woman cut out of her mother’s will when she left her estate to three charities may be a landmark that sets a new precedent.

Although not specifically about legacies to charity, the ruling could affect those cases each year where an individual has disinherited their family in favour of one or more charities.

In this instance, Melita Jackson left all her £486,000 estate to the RSPCA, RSPB and Blue Cross in 2004. In so doing, she cut out her daughter Heather Ilot, from whom she had been estranged since 1978. The daughter has successfully challenged the will and been awarded £164,000 or a third of the estate. This is unusual, in that previously a successful claim could only be made where it could be shown that the person challenging the will had been financially reliant on the deceased person (which was not the case here).

While the ruling will not prevent people from cutting relatives out of their will, it does mean they will now have to be very careful to document and justify their decision and demonstrate their reasons for supporting charities instead.

Advertisement

Great Fundraising Organizations, by Alan Clayton. Buy now.

How might this affect charities?

So what are the implications for charities? It is possible that this ruling will reduce the number of contentious legacies they receive. Although this could mean less money for charities, the upside is that it could also mean fewer PR battles to avoid the negative publicity that can sometimes arise in these cases. We all remember the RSPCA’s battle over the Gill case and the publicity that generated.

There seem to be no direct implications for legacy marketing. After all, not many charities have openly encouraged supporters to disinherit family members (though many may have secretly hoped for this). In fact, the ruling seems to chime well with the prevailing theme of “family first”, whereby charities encourage donors to provide for their loved ones, before remembering the charity in their will. This is clearly the responsible path to follow and today’s ruling only supports this.
 
Simon George is a Director of Wootton George Consulting

Loading

Mastodon