Values alignment not necessarily best basis for ethical decisions on refusing donations
Melanie May | 6 November 2024 | News
A new paper from fundraising think tank Rogare suggests that values alignment may not be the best way to make the most consistent ethical decisions about refusing donations.
Take it or Leave It: The Ethics of Gift Acceptance and Refusal is the result of work with the UK’s Chartered Institute of Fundraising to develop ‘a richer ethics’ of gift acceptance and refusal, and a companion piece to the CIOF’s guidance on how to construct and write acceptance/refusal policies.
The paper considers the ethical pros and cons of the main reasons for refusing a donation, for example, when accepting it would cause harm to the charity, such as loss of further donations, or beneficiaries being less likely to use its services. Another possible reason is that there is a moral principle why a donation ought to be refused, from a blanket prohibition on working with particular types of donor, to a lack of alignment between the donor/donation and the charity’s organisational values, or it coming from a source the charity considers morally unacceptable.
Advertisement
However, Rogare says that while a decision based on harm will focus on the evidence about how much harm is likely to result from accepting a donation, using values to guide decision-making requires a fundraiser to make a subjective evaluation of the donor’s values and intent. It adds that any such decision about a donor can be countered by a subjective opinion made by someone else – trustees, the media, regulators or the donor themself – that interprets the donor’s values and intentions differently. A decision based on evidence of harm sidesteps these kinds of he said/she said gainsaying arguments.
Rogare’s Director Ian MacQuillin commented:
“If a donor/donation is so out of line with a charity’s values, then it is almost certain to result in some kind of harm, such as other donors stopping their giving, or beneficiaries being deterred from seeking help.
“A hypothetical example we use in the new paper is the case of a faith-based charity that is offered a donation from someone associated with sex work. Even though it probably feels totally counter-intuitive not to make the decision based on alignment with the charity’s values, we contend they could make the same decision based on harm. And that would go for most ethical decision making in most cases of tainted money.
“We’re not saying values don’t or ought not play a role in the ethics of gift refusal. But we are asking whether they are really needed in most cases.”
The paper also looks at:
- How relevant fundraisers’ personal moral convictions are in deciding to refuse a donation
- The ethics of returning donations
- What new thinking is needed to facilitate sound decision-making about sources of donations that might harm society as a whole, even if accepting would be in the best interest of the recipient charity
Claire Stanley, Director of Policy and Communications at the CIOF commented:
“There is no single solution to the challenges around deciding to refuse a donation, and every organisation needs to develop their own approach that will enable them to fulfil their charitable objectives.
“At the Chartered Institute, we have published guidance, co-created with our members, that provides an overview of current regulation and key considerations when creating an acceptance and refusal policy.
“Through our partnership with Rogare, we aim to go one step further and explore the ethical schools of thought that can guide decision making. Although guidance and policies are incredibly helpful to ensure that charities make consistent decisions and do not inadvertently breach regulations, they cannot account for every scenario or explain why people can have differing opinions on what is the right course of action.”
Related posts
Fundraising think tank to bring new thinking to fundraising from other disciplines
Rogare to launch report series on worldwide fundraising challenges
Objections to fundraising during pandemic explored in Rogare project
New Rogare project will create theory & evidence knowledge bases to help fundraisers inform work
About Melanie May
Melanie May is a journalist and copywriter specialising in writing both for and about the charity and marketing services sectors since 2001. She can be reached via thepurplepim.com.