# Bad AI comes from bad data

- Link: https://fundraising.co.uk/2018/02/20/bad-artificial-intelligence-comes-bad-data/
- Published: 2018-02-20T14:17:39+00:00
- Author: Steve MacLaughlin

**For as long as there have been science fiction movies and television series there
have been bad robots. Gort. Robby. Colossus. HAL 9000. Ash. Maximilian. Cylons. 
Terminators. IG-88. Decepticons Lore. Bishop. Ultron. To name a few.**

These stories warn us of a future where intelligent machines have turned against
their human creators. Their sentient sensibilities have developed a mind of their
own. Hollywood has given us plenty of reasons to fear artificial intelligence. Bad
AI usually means very bad things for humans.

But that’s science fiction and artificial intelligence is actually part of computer
science. Though it’s understandable that the two often get confused. We’ve had robots
and maniacal machines in fiction longer than we’ve had them in fact. Today, we continue
to see the growing importance of artificial intelligence – but also the potential
perils.
While there are many definitions of artificial intelligence, there are two
that most would agree on:

## Advertisement

 [⌊Posthub advert. You create the campaign. We'll handle the postal journey. Get started at post-hub.co.uk.⌉](https://fundraising.co.uk/ads/posthub-20261007-300x250/)

 * artificial intelligence is the theory and development of computer systems able
   to perform tasks that normally require human intelligence
 * artificial intelligence enables machines to process information and learn from
   data.

That last definition has a lot of relevance in a modern context. Forms of AI like
machine learning have a massive dependency on existing data to inform their algorithms
and recommendations. Get the wrong data or bad data and suddenly the AI goes haywire.

This got me to thinking. Perhaps all those science fiction interpretations of AI
were on to something.What if the HAL 9000 and all those other machines-gone-bad 
were the result of bad data? A few too many algorithms under the influence of bad
inputs. That would indeed explain a lot of things.

![Steve MacLaughlin photo with quotation from him on bad data and AI](https://wfay6x.
infiniteuploads.cloud/2018/02/steve-maclaughlin-quote-ai.webp)

Steve MacLaughlin on bad data and AI

It would also suggest that the future of AI and the benefits from it are directly
tied to the quality of your data. I know that talking about data hygiene is not 
the most exciting topic in the world. That’s why I’ve banned that moniker and have
been referring to it as “data health” for a while now. 

## Not data hygiene but data health

Data health is good for you. Data health is good for your organisation. Data health
is how we prevent bad AI. Within Data health there are three key components:

 * Data Quality
 * Data Completeness
 * Data Design.

Attention to these three areas in the right proportion are necessary building blocks
to the better use of data.

**Data quality** is all about the accuracy and correctness of data. In the nonprofit
sector, things like address quality, data entry quality, deceased suppression, and
other continuous cleaning of the data is very important. If you start out with bad
data, then it only gets worse from there, never better. This is especially true 
when data is being fed into artificial intelligence capabilities.

**Data completeness** is the degree to which we have a total picture of donors, 
volunteers, activists, and other key constituent groups. This is a combination of
self-reported information in addition to appended demographic data. Over time, the
goal is to have a broader understanding of constituent’s interests, engagements,
and preferences.

Together, data quality and completeness are about 90% of the data health challenge.
And yet, many of the claims of data struggle are design related. The plethora of
custom fields in a system that can’t be normalised or made meaningful. The skeletons
in the data closet from decisions made in the past about how data collection and
management have been handled poorly.

Fixing **data design** issues will take more time and toil but addressing data quality
and completeness can be started without delay. The sooner that data health is prioritised,
valued, and championed then the greater chances for benefits to the organisation.
Not to mention the critical role this plays in the use of AI capabilities today 
and into the future.

If you want to learn more about data intelligence and how AI could affect your charity,
Steve MacLaughlin is hosting a webinar series with Blackbaud and The Resource Alliance.
You can [register today](https://hello.blackbaud.com/IBU-BBE_11249_IntelligenceForGood_2018_Reg-LP.html).
_
[**Steve MacLaughlin**](https://www.blackbaud.com/nonprofit-experts/steve-maclaughlin.aspx)
is Blackbaud’s VP of Data and Analytics_ 

 * **[AI workshop & funding offer from Tech Trust & Microsoft](https://fundraising.co.uk/2018/07/19/ai-workshop-funding-offer-tech-trust-microsoft/)**(
   19 July 2018)
 * **[AI to be used to tackle global issues in new digital initiative](https://fundraising.co.uk/2019/02/05/ai-used-tackle-global-issues-new-digital-initiative/)**(
   5 February 2019)
 * **[Futurus Group files patent for AI-based gratitude prediction model](https://fundraising.co.uk/2019/06/03/futurus-group-files-patent-for-ai-based-gratitude-prediction-model/)**(
   3 June 2019)

![Loading](https://fundraising.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/page-views-count/ajax-loader-
2x.gif)
