# A guide to dealing with online harassment for charities and social enterprises

- Link: https://fundraising.co.uk/2017/10/02/guide-dealing-online-harassment-charities-social-enterprises/
- Published: 2017-10-02T11:37:32+01:00
- Author: Howard Lake

**Dealing with online harassment is a very delicate dance that’s part art part science,
and if you get it right, the benefits might even outweigh the harassment in the 
first place.**

There have been a few recent examples of organisations dealing with online harassment
so successfully that they’ve ended up going viral. Earlier this year the fast food
chain Wendy’s had an entertaining Twitter exchange with someone claiming they used
frozen burgers.

Wendy’s sassy comebacks eventually led to the [unnamed individual deleting not only the tweets in question](http://www.adweek.com/agencyspy/wendys-shows-us-all-how-to-respond-to-a-twitter-troll/123211),
but also their entire Twitter account.

## Advertisement

 [⌊Posthub advert. You create the campaign. We'll handle the postal journey. Get started at post-hub.co.uk.⌉](https://fundraising.co.uk/ads/posthub-20261007-300x250/)

Another successful example from earlier this year is when [Calais Action](https://twitter.com/calaisaction?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor),
a charity devoted to delivering essentials such as clothing to thousands of migrants
in the French Port, started replying to comments involving criticism with a link
to donate. They coined it ‘[TrollAid](https://fundraising.co.uk/2016/01/26/trollaid-ensures-abusive-online-posters-promote-fundraising-for-refugees/)’
and raised over £800, essentially profiting from online harassment.

## Extent of harassment?

Although these examples highlight creative and effective ways to deal with online
abuse, many charities and social enterprises are unsure of how to respond, and for
these organisations we’ve created a guide.

According to a study carried out last year by the Data & Society Research Institute
that surveyed 3,002 Americans, [women are disproportionately affected by online harassment](https://datasociety.net/blog/2016/11/21/online-harassment/).
20% of young women aged 15-29 reported online stalking (compared with 8% of all 
internet users), and 41% of women aged 15-29 self-censored in order to avoid online
abuse. LGBTQ Internet users are also more than twice as likely to experience online
harassment than heterosexual Internet users.

Although there are no studies looking exclusively at the effects of online harassment
on charities, in my experience from working closely with a wide variety of charities
and non-profit organisations it’s clear that many deal with online harassment on
a regular basis, and view it as a serious threat.

## Free guide for charities

[Social Misfits Media](http://www.socialmisfitsmedia.com/) have teamed up with [Hollaback!](https://www.ihollaback.org/)
to put together a [free guide for charities to use when dealing with online harassment](https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7MQMOUE1FbBWDQzdVB4czVuME0/view).

Emily May, Co-founder and Executive Director of Hollaback! says: “Online harassment
is on the rise globally, and organisations doing great work are increasingly targeted.
We partnered with Social Misfits Media on this infographic to help teams distinguish
between what is and isn’t online harassment, and figure out what to do when online
harassment occurs.”

May adds: “Too often we see organisations eager to ignore online harassment, only
to discover later that the harassment poses a security risk, or that it’s silencing
staff from speaking out online. This guide is a first step to deciding what is or
isn’t

online harassment, and then responding to it.”

 

![Online harrassment flowchart](https://wfay6x.infiniteuploads.cloud/2017/09/online-
harrassment-flowchart-detail-social-misfits-media.png)

_The infographic includes a flowchart for dealing with harassment_

The guide is to be used in the moment, when an organisation receives online abuse
and is unsure of next steps, to help them deal quickly and efficiently with any 
negative comments and criticism. The flowchart will establish whether the comment
is harassment, and then determine how it should be dealt with. For example if the
comment is threatening, the flowchart advises taking a screenshot of it to keep 
on file incase of escalation, and then reporting it to the platform. However, if
it’s an individual with a genuine grievance, or if someone is misinformed, the flowchart
recommends resolving this, privately if possible, by citing them and fixing the 
facts. When dealing with any comments it’s always a good idea to be timely, keep
a calm tone of voice, and consider substantiating any information by including a
link to facts.

## How one charity uses the guide

I spoke to Nick Harvey, Head of Communications for the medical charity, Doctors 
of the World, about using the guide to deal with online abuse. “We help refugees
and migrants in the UK get the healthcare they are entitled to, which is a lightning
rod for negative comments from some people,” says Harvey. “Having a simple flowchart
that our staff and volunteers can use to check how they should respond, on a case
by case basis, is a really useful tool.”

Organisations who are helping vulnerable people, such as Doctors of the World, need
the internet. Social media helps these organisations reach those who need them most,
and although we can’t stop online abuse, there is a way to deal with it that allows
organisations to continue their great work whilst minimising harm to their mission,
staff and beneficiaries.

Disseminating this guide to everyone who works for an organisation, including volunteers,
will ensure there is a succinct and informed way of dealing with online abuse. In
tandem with this, it’s also a good idea for organisations to think about long-term
policies and procedures (see [Hollaback’s online resources](https://iheartmob.org/resources)).
By having wider policies and procedures in place to complement this guide, I hope
that individuals and organisations can feel in control of, and not deterred by, 
any negativity they receive online.

 

_**Hannah Donald** is Community Manager at [Social Misfits Media](http://socialmisfitsmedia.com)._

 * **[Why are charities paying too much for their energy?](https://fundraising.co.uk/2018/02/07/charities-paying-too-much-energy-bills/)**(
   7 February 2018)
 * **[THINK consultancy launches Culture Forum for senior charity leaders](https://fundraising.co.uk/2018/12/06/think-consultancy-launches-culture-forum-senior-charity-leaders/)**(
   6 December 2018)
 * **[IFRG looks for successor to CEO](https://fundraising.co.uk/1997/03/13/ifrg-looks-successor-ceo/)**(
   13 March 1997)

![Loading](https://fundraising.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/page-views-count/ajax-loader-
2x.gif)
