# Donor-centred or beneficiary-centred. It’s a non-issue

- Link: https://fundraising.co.uk/2017/06/26/donor-centred-beneficiary-centred-non-issue/
- Published: 2017-06-26T10:54:51+01:00
- Author: Giles Pegram CBE

**If you give a donor a great experience, she will give more, and give for longer.
Also, giving a donor a great experience is the right thing to do.**

 

But there is a perception that I have picked up from some quarters, which concerns
me, and I don’t believe is true.

## Advertisement

 

That being ‘donor-centred’ means spending more money on the donor, and therefore
less on the beneficiaries. That being ‘donor-centred’ or ‘beneficiary-centred’ are
alternatives. Fundamentally different.

 

I believe that couldn’t be less true.

 

## 526 recommendations

 

The Commission on the Donor Experience has 526 recommendations. Some will involve
spending more money, in the short term. But that is an investment in the donor’s
long-term support. The reason that you should spend more on your donor’s experience
is, of course, that it will allow you to spend more on programmes in the future,
not less.

 

But the majority of the Commission’s recommendations are not about spending more
money on the donor experience, but changing the culture so that we start planning
our fundraising by thinking about the motivations of the donor, not the needs of
the charity, and in so doing, raise more for the charity and its beneficiaries.

 

Take a few examples.

 

## Continuous Donor Choice

 

Continuous Donor Choice, the Commission’s alternative to ‘opt-in’, will give each
donor, each time you communicate with them, the opportunity to choose to receive
additional communications, fewer communications, or none at all. This will cost 
relatively little. Some donors, delighted at being given more choice, will give 
more.

 

Some will opt-out completely, thus saving money on communicating with people who
really don’t want to hear from you. Positioned this way, that is good, not bad.

 

There are projects on the channels we use to communicate with donors: direct mail,
DRTV, mass media. These are not suggesting spending more, just altering what we 
say, in content, and in tone, and the way we ask for money, by thinking about the
donor first.

 

CDE project 6, Ken Burnett’s _magnum opus_ on the use of emotion is, again, not 
suggesting spending more money, just painstakingly thinking through how we use emotion
in our fundraising, to engage, not to shock. And the more we can engage a donor 
in the problem, the solution, and her role in that solution, the more she will give.

 

We need to re-think all our fundraising, seeing it from the perspective of the donor.

 

No-one should think, for one moment, that the recommendations of the Commission 
are to carry on as normal and just spend more on giving donors a good experience.

 

And, indeed, any donor who believed that is what we were doing would be outraged,
and rightly.

 

As Ken has [written very recently, and very succinctly](https://fundraising.co.uk/2017/06/19/why-we-should-spend-more-on-our-donors-experience/):“
The paradigm has changed, irrevocably. Factory fundraising and the target-led approach,
always questionable, now evidently no longer work well. Those charities that put
the donor experience at the heart of their strategies will thrive. Those that don’t,
won’t”

 

I couldn’t have put it better myself.

 

Giles Pegram CBE

 

Vice Chair

 

The Commission on the Donor Experience

 

© Giles Pegram CBE

 

22.vi.2017

 * **[DMA letter urges extension to ‘soft opt-in’ for charity emails](https://fundraising.co.uk/2024/11/25/charities-back-dma-letter-calling-for-extension-to-soft-opt-in-for-emails/)**(
   25 November 2024)
 * **[Confused about future ‘opt in’ rules? You’re not the only one](https://fundraising.co.uk/2016/04/22/confused-about-future-opt-in-rules-youre-not-the-only-one/)**(
   22 April 2016)
 * **[Get up close and personal to persuade people to allow fundraising contact](https://fundraising.co.uk/2016/07/13/get-close-personal-persuade-people-allow-fundraising-contact/)**(
   13 July 2016)

![Loading](https://fundraising.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/page-views-count/ajax-loader-
2x.gif)
