# Let’s push our own re-set button

- Link: https://fundraising.co.uk/2016/12/08/lets-push-re-set-button/
- Published: 2016-12-08T12:40:41+00:00
- Author: Guest Blogger

**The Daily Mail really hates us. Not a lot we can do about that. But we could stop
handing them material.**

This week has seen yet another round of biased, aggressive, outright [vitriolic headlines](https://fundraising.co.uk/2016/12/07/icos-rulings-job-half-done/)
against the sector we love. And, rightly, we’ve been protesting (albeit amongst 
ourselves) that the treatment has been unfair. Which it is, right up to the point
that it isn’t.

Putting aside all the things we had no control over (i.e. the clumsy handling by
the ICO, and the obvious media bias), we should look at what was under our control,
to see how this could have been avoided.

## Advertisement

Let’s ask, objectively, what happened here?

1. Donors to a couple of big name charities donated the amount they were asked for

2. These charities, **without consent**, wealth screened those donors to target 
them for bigger gifts (as though ability to give more correlates with wanting to)

3. Donors were upset this was being done to them without their knowledge

If our immediate defence is to say, ‘but commercials can do it, why can’t we?’ we
miss the point. It goes without saying that it’s just as intrusive and irritating
when done by a commercial. But do people feel the same sense of guilt ignoring what
they send as they do when it’s sent on behalf of someone in desperate need? Do they
feel their kindness and generosity is something for which they should be targeted?

The tragedy is we know for sure that the charities who were ‘exposed’, and all the
others who weren’t, had nothing but the best of motives. **The danger comes from
confusing good motives with good practice**.

If these donors had been asked for, and given their consent, there would have been
no ‘scandal’. But they weren’t so there was.

## Can your charity answer these questions?

This latest media mauling is the inevitable outcome of the factory assembly line
mentality the sector has towards the kind people who give their support. With a 
handful of notable exceptions, there isn’t a charity in the UK today who can answer
for sure:

1. Why people support (Identity)

2. What they want from their support (Preference)

3. What it’s like to support (Experience)

We either don’t ask these questions, or think we have the answers. Year upon year
of low to no net growth and lousy donor retention should be all the evidence we 
need that neither way is working.

The charities in this latest round of headlines obviously didn’t know their donors’
preferences, again either because they didn’t think to ask them, or because they
assumed they knew them. On the other hand, charities that have cracked the code 
to these three questions, and built their entire proposition around them are delivering
far greater value to supporters and deriving much greater value from them (e.g. 
70% increase in revenue per donor, increased first three months’ retention in face
to face from 60% to 80% etc.)

Last week’s FPS announcement means we’ve been spared the big re-set button we all
feared. Now we need to build a better button!

We will never get the press off our backs, and more importantly, never see the growth
our causes need us to make, until we **press re-set on the methods, metrics and 
most of all mindset that got us into this mess.**

 

_**Charlie Hulme** is Managing Director of [DonorVoice](http://thedonorvoice.com)_

 

_Photo: Reset button by MyImages Micha on [Shutterstock.com](http://shutterstock.com)_

 * **[Are charities ready for the new world of data protection?](https://fundraising.co.uk/2016/12/20/charities-ready-new-world-data-protection/)**(
   20 December 2016)
 * **[Database screening and consent](https://fundraising.co.uk/2017/01/16/database-screening-consent/)**(
   16 January 2017)
 * **[Julia Porter joins fast.MAP as Chair of its Advisory Board](https://fundraising.co.uk/2017/01/26/julia-porter-joins-fast-map-as-chair-of-its-advisory-board/)**(
   26 January 2017)

![Loading](https://fundraising.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/page-views-count/ajax-loader-
2x.gif)
