# Maybe we should all be more Owl

- Link: https://fundraising.co.uk/2016/07/05/maybe-we-should-all-be-more-owl/
- Published: 2016-07-05T23:26:53+01:00
- Author: Howard Lake

**10 points Richard Sved learned from day two of Fundraising Convention, 2016.**

## 1. Think about how well we reflect our communities

> "If we are shocked by the brexit result, is that because we don't reflect our 
> communities well enough?" [@karlwilding](https://twitter.com/karlwilding?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)
> [#FundraisingConvention](https://twitter.com/hashtag/FundraisingConvention?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)
> — Richard Sved (@richardsved) [July 5, 2016](https://twitter.com/richardsved/status/750287578067267584?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)

## Advertisement

 [⌊Posthub advert. You create the campaign. We'll handle the postal journey. Get started at post-hub.co.uk.⌉](https://fundraising.co.uk/ads/posthub-20261007-300x250/)

 

In a packed discussion about what the EU referendum result means for charities, 
Karl Wilding asked the audience why we were surprised by the result. Is it because
we don’t reflect the communities we serve well enough? Food for thought.

## 2. We must speak out now

In the same session, Angela Kitching reflected that charities were hamstrung by 
the Charity Commission guidance in the run-up to the vote. But we know the needs
of our beneficiaries, and we owe it to them to speak out now.

> We were hamstrung by pre-election guidance but we must speak out. We know our 
> beneficiaries.[#FundraisingConvention](https://twitter.com/hashtag/FundraisingConvention?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)
> [pic.twitter.com/Zgbjey8qw5](https://t.co/Zgbjey8qw5)
> — Richard Sved (@richardsved) [July 5, 2016](https://twitter.com/richardsved/status/750297578462277632?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)

 

## 3. We will get through this

And Caron Bradshaw argued that whatever the storm charities are heading towards,
we will get through it. We always do. We’ve been doing it for centuries, she argued.

> We may be heading to a storm but we l'll get through it. It's what we've done 
> for centuries.[#FundraisingConvention](https://twitter.com/hashtag/FundraisingConvention?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)
> [pic.twitter.com/IbVTMAN5uq](https://t.co/IbVTMAN5uq)
> — Richard Sved (@richardsved) [July 5, 2016](https://twitter.com/richardsved/status/750288998652907520?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)

 

## 4. Fundraisers like to sing, apparently

It was fascinating to attend Beth Breeze’s sneak preview of her findings from her
large study of ‘The New Fundraisers’. There were some interesting facts that may
not have surprised us too much, for example that we are mainly female. However, 
it was interesting to discover how much more likely we are to be community-minded–
to give blood, to sing in a choir, to have hobbies. Is there a danger that we will
continue to recruit ‘people like us’?

> We fundraisers like community oriented activities, says [@UKCPhilanthropy](https://twitter.com/UKCPhilanthropy?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw).
> I'm in a band 🙂[#FundraisingConvention](https://twitter.com/hashtag/FundraisingConvention?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)
> [pic.twitter.com/tqEr6ArEDv](https://t.co/tqEr6ArEDv)
> — Richard Sved (@richardsved) [July 5, 2016](https://twitter.com/richardsved/status/750321409935679489?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)

 

## 5. Legacy fundraisers are finely tuned… emotion-reading machines

Beth found that legacy fundraisers were the most finely attuned to the emotional
expression and body language of others. It could be said they’re in the right job,
because they have got to be especially attuned to sensitivities.

> Legacy fundraisers were found to be most finely attuned to body language, [@UKCPhilanthropy](https://twitter.com/UKCPhilanthropy?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)
> found[@ClaireyJaneR](https://twitter.com/ClaireyJaneR?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) <=[#FundraisingConvention](https://twitter.com/hashtag/FundraisingConvention?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)
> — Richard Sved (@richardsved) [July 5, 2016](https://twitter.com/richardsved/status/750323996978253824?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)

 

## 6. Maybe we should all be more Owl

In his entertaining session on the personal effectiveness track, Matthew Sherrington
took us through a range of helpful animal-based analogies. Are we rhinos (charging
in) or hedgehogs (curling up) when we face conflict? How politically aware and organisation-
focused are we? If we’re high in both we’re owls, and if we’re low in both, we may
be donkeys, who “don’t really know what’s going on”.

> "Donkeys don't really know what's going on"
> Should have chosen owl.[#FundraisingConvention](https://twitter.com/hashtag/FundraisingConvention?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)
> [pic.twitter.com/iUgicdXZgI](https://t.co/iUgicdXZgI)
> — Richard Sved (@richardsved) [July 5, 2016](https://twitter.com/richardsved/status/750337645205676032?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)

 

## 7. Recruiters focus on attitude

When we head to interviews, we might normally assume it’s going to be our skills
and knowledge that people look for when they’re hiring, but those can be more easily
developed. The attitude is what will get us the job, Matthew told us.

> *This* is what people look for when hiring. Knowledge/skills can be developed.
> [@m_sherrington](https://twitter.com/m_sherrington?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) [#FundraisingConvention](https://twitter.com/hashtag/FundraisingConvention?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)
> [pic.twitter.com/OAJqrURS2s](https://t.co/OAJqrURS2s)
> — Richard Sved (@richardsved) [July 5, 2016](https://twitter.com/richardsved/status/750338756830433281?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)

 

## 8. Clock off at a reasonable time

What example do we set our team if we can’t pay attention to ourselves? If we’re
shattered, what help are we anyway? Go home at a reasonable hour, and our teams 
will look after themselves too. This is the new workplace of the 21 st century.

> What example do you set your staff in how you look after yourself? If shattered,
> go home![#FundraisingConvention](https://twitter.com/hashtag/FundraisingConvention?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)
> [pic.twitter.com/O3ZrdgNbUn](https://t.co/O3ZrdgNbUn)
> — Richard Sved (@richardsved) [July 5, 2016](https://twitter.com/richardsved/status/750340399466708992?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)

## 9. We need to pay attention to the opportunities of Virtual Reality

> VR is featured at [@nfptweetup](https://twitter.com/NFPtweetup?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)
> session at [#FundraisingConvention](https://twitter.com/hashtag/FundraisingConvention?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw),
> including [@TOMSuk](https://twitter.com/tomsuk?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) Virtual Giving
> Trip: [https://t.co/fteqg6CafA](https://t.co/fteqg6CafA)
> — Howard Lake (@howardlake) [July 5, 2016](https://twitter.com/howardlake/status/750356898646458368?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)

 

Ade Cockle gave his audience at the #NFPtweetup session a brilliant whistle-stop
tour of the increasing opportunities that Virtual Reality holds for the charity 
sector, with examples from RNLI, Cancer Research UK, UNICEF and the Natural History
Museum. As this technology gets more and more accessible, we need to be on it!

## 10. The #Unconvention is a great way forward

I attended two sessions in the ‘Unconventional’ track in the first two days, and
they were both excellent. Let’s hope these type of sessions continue to be offered,
because they provide an excellent counterpoint to the ‘normal’ seminars that are‘
conventionally’ offered. Pun intended.

 * **[Report from UK’s first nfptweetup](https://fundraising.co.uk/2008/11/25/report-uk039s-first-nfptweetup/)**(
   25 November 2008)
 * **[Fourth NFPtweetup to be held on 24 September](https://fundraising.co.uk/2009/08/25/fourth-nfptweetup-be-held-24-september/)**(
   25 August 2009)
 * **[NFPTweetup shows importance of coordination and creativity on social media](https://fundraising.co.uk/2010/09/17/nfptweetup-shows-importance-coordination-and-creativity-social-media/)**(
   17 September 2010)

![Loading](https://fundraising.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/page-views-count/ajax-loader-
2x.gif)
