# Studies call for new approach to grantmaking

- Link: https://fundraising.co.uk/2016/06/15/studies-call-new-approach-grantmaking/
- Published: 2016-06-15T09:41:45+01:00
- Author: Melanie May

**Only a quarter of UK charities are applying for funding for their core costs, 
according to the [Garfield Weston Foundation](http://www.garfieldweston.org).**

 

The Foundation announced the finding, based on the charities that have applied to
it over the last five years, along with the winners of its recent [Weston Charity Awards](http://www.westoncharityawards.org/),
which give small charities across the North of England and the Midlands unrestricted
funding and strategic support.

## Advertisement

 

Sixteen charities working in the areas of youth, welfare and community won the awards,
including the [Apex Charitable Trust](http://www.apextrust.com/), [Disability Action Yorkshire](http://www.disabilityactionyorkshire.org.uk/),
and [Key Changes](http://www.keychangesuwp.org.uk/) in Sheffield. The winners receive
funding as well as access to a team of senior business leaders through [Pilotlight](http://www.pilotlight.org.uk).

 

Philippa Charles, director of Garfield Weston Foundation said:

 

> “Supporting the running costs of a charity is crucial if we are to avoid charities
> experiencing a slow decline. Charities tell us they are too afraid to ask for 
> this sort of funding for fear of being turned down. Having supported thousands
> of charities over the last 60 years, we know how important it is that charities
> feel able to apply for this sort of funding so that they can continue to deliver
> great services.”

 

A US study has also highlighted the need for charities to apply for enough money
to cover all costs. _The Pay-What-It-Takes Philanthropy_ study, conducted by [The Bridgespan Group](http://www.bridgespan.org/)
and published in the [Stanford Social Innovation Review](http://ssir.org/), addresses
the issue of funders providing full financial support for programmes and services,
but not for overhead costs, and calls for a new grantmaking approach that provides
enough money for nonprofits to pay for all their operations, rather than solely 
programmes and services.

 

The Bridgespan Group examined the financial records of 20 well-known, high-performing
US nonprofits to determine their actual indirect costs: those not attributed to 
a specific programme or service.

 

It discovered that indirect costs make up a much larger percentage of a nonprofit’s
total costs than is widely understood, with different segments of the nonprofit 
sector having different indirect cost structures. Of the nonprofits surveyed, indirect
costs made up between 21 per cent and 89 per cent of total costs, with the median
indirect cost rate for all 20 nonprofits at 40 percent. This is nearly three times
the 15 per cent overhead rate that most foundations provide, according to the study.

 

The study suggests that flat rate reimbursement for indirect costs is conceptually
wrong because it fails to take into account the differences by nonprofit segment,
with the typical reimbursement rate of 15 per cent failing to represent the actual
indirect costs it takes to run any of the nonprofits analysed.

 

It pinpoints the need for grantmakers to realise that different types of nonprofits
have different cost structures, and suggests building a framework for a new approach
to philanthropic grantmaking that shifts from an emphasis on what it takes to fund
a programme to what it takes to achieve impact.

 

Some funders are already rethinking their approach, according to the study, but 
to make the pay-what-it-takes approach work, nonprofits need to be clear about their
operational needs and how those needs relate to desired impact. The study suggests
the introduction of benchmarks for indirect costs to help lay the groundwork for
identifying best practices, and setting target indirect cost expenditure levels 
for most nonprofits, which could create a basis for a shared understanding between
nonprofits and foundations of a new approach to grantmaking that accounts for nonprofits’
real cost.

 

More can be read here: [http://ssir.org/articles/entry/pay_what_it_takes_philanthropy](http://ssir.org/articles/entry/pay_what_it_takes_philanthropy).

 * **[Pride of Britain awards to recognise fundraisers](https://fundraising.co.uk/2016/06/29/pride-britain-awards-recognise-fundraisers/)**(
   29 June 2016)
 * **[Jewson announces 2016 Building Better Communities winners](https://fundraising.co.uk/2016/07/14/jewson-announces-2016-building-better-communities-winners/)**(
   14 July 2016)
 * **[ScottishPower Foundation awards £30K to UK charities](https://fundraising.co.uk/2016/09/27/scottishpower-foundation-awards-30k-uk-charities/)**(
   27 September 2016)

![Loading](https://fundraising.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/page-views-count/ajax-loader-
2x.gif)
