# Why charities should make a big deal of being small

- Link: https://fundraising.co.uk/2015/09/10/why-charities-should-make-a-big-deal-of-being-small/
- Published: 2015-09-10T07:30:25+01:00
- Author: Howard Lake

**Small, local charities are struggling amid cuts and the unabated shift to contract
culture. [20% of small charities report serious concerns about closure](https://www.cafonline.org/docs/default-source/about-us-publications/caf-social-landscape-report-2015).
Staff turnover in the sector is rapid, mainly as a result of small charities only
having the capacity to offer short-term contracts.**

Moreover, many small charities have been forced to make substantial changes to their
services in order to match the funding conditions set by local authorities and other
contract providers – often steering them away from their core mission.

In order to preserve the independence and uniqueness of the UK’s small charity sector,
it is essential that sustainable, less conditional sources of funding are found.

## Advertisement

## The power of individual donations

One solution to this lies in harnessing the power of individual donations. At present
small charities and community groups receive a [disproportionately small amount of donations from the general public](https://www.cafonline.org/about-us/publications/2014-publications/2014-infographic).
However, this disparity is by no means inevitable.

There is mounting evidence that the general public’s perception of small, local 
charities is actually far more positive than that of their bigger counterparts. 
A 2013 study by [Borgloha et al](https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolet/v120y2013i2p242-244.html)
found that, given the choice between donating to (otherwise equal) large or small
charities the vast majority of people (73% -27%) chose to donate to small charities.
Another recent study by [Hall et al](http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1858&context=sspapers)
has shown that the public are often much more receptive to calls for donations from“
local” charities than national or international charities.

How then can local, small charities convert this positive perception into donations?

For resource reasons few small, local charities are able to compete directly with
larger charities. However, this may not be such a bad thing. Most smaller charities
target a far more specific cause or demographic. As a result, mass marketing techniques–
such as those used by larger charities to appeal to vast swathes of the population–
are unlikely to be the most effective way to generate support.

## Big is not necessarily better

The key to developing a successful fundraising and marketing strategy for smaller
charities is not to imitate the strategies of large charities, but to recognise 
and highlight their unique strengths – to make a big deal of being small.

This does not necessarily mean littering marketing materials with references to 
size (although direct references to size should not be discounted given the public’s
positive attitude to small charities). What this means is thinking carefully about
what people like about small or local charities and really emphasising these points.

Of course, each charity or community group has its own unique strengths, but there
are also certain characteristics that are common throughout the sector and are generally
seen as positive attributes. These include:

● **Flexibility** – Small charities often have the ability to react spontaneously
to changing circumstances and arising needs. Small organisations are usually far
less bureaucratic and operate on the ground, making a difference quicker.

● **Specific knowledge of local areas and needs** – Small, local charities often
have an acute understanding of the facilities and dynamics of an area. This enables
them to provide tailored services that directly deal with local issues.

● **Close ties with communities** – Small charities are often naturally embedded
into their communities, making it easier for them to develop close bonds with local
people. For example, staff members, volunteers and beneficiaries frequently have
community bonds outside of the organisation and small charities are generally perceived
to be more approachable. This is advantageous in a number of ways:

– Community networks and connections give charities numerous opportunities for promotion,
volunteer recruitment and fundraising. These can be used to engage local groups,
clubs, schools and individuals in the cause and ultimately convert them into fundraisers
and/or donors.

– A core motivation for people to donate to small, local charities is the opportunity
to [contribute to (and improve) the community they live or grew up in](http://www.philanthropy.org.au/involved/charities.html).

● **Close bonds with donors** – Donors are more likely to support charities with
whom they share strong psychological connections. Big charities (and companies) 
spend large amounts of money on personalising their marketing materials to induce
feelings of involvement among donors and potential donors. Small, local charities
often have a unique advantage in this area. Local charities particularly benefit
from this due to their shared experiences and associations with potential local 
donors. However, small charities with a less local focus may also benefit through
building similar personal, even face-to-face connections with people interested 
in their cause.

● **[Donations to small charities proportionally make a bigger difference than those given to a large charity](https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolet/v120y2013i2p242-244.html)**.
i.e. the same donation given to a large charity will have a smaller overall impact
on the charity’s service provision than if it were given to a small charity.

Emphasising this difference can strengthen donor relationships, particularly if 
charities are able to show supporters how their money has been spent and the impact
it has had.

As well as looking at their own attributes, small charities should also consider
why the public’s perception of larger charities is less positive. Reasons often 
cited include: guilt based fundraising, bad experiences of street fundraisers, cold
calling and the headline figures about overheads and wages. Small charities that
are considering borrowing ideas and strategies from larger charities must be careful
to avoid these pitfalls.

The key to survival for many small charities is to successfully diversify their 
funding sources without losing the essence of what they do and why they are unique.
As technology becomes more and more accessible, even the smallest groups now have
the opportunity to venture into new areas – such as online fundraising and digital
marketing – that have previously been the preserve of larger charities. By making
use of these new tools and technologies and simultaneously playing to their individual
strengths – be they flexibility, community links or even size itself – small charities
can maximise the impact of their messaging, grow their supporter base and start 
to generate more donations to help fund their future work. Now that really is a 
big deal.

 

_**Lewis Garland** is Communications Executive at [Localgiving](http://www.localgiving.com),
a membership organisation for local charities and community groups in the UK. He
has worked extensively in research and project management with grassroots organisations
both in the UK and South Asia._

 

_Image: [traditional Russian doll “Matreshka”](http://www.shutterstock.com/pic-314187185.html)
by Anton Mezinov on Shutterstock.com_

 * **[Starbucks offers £150k to local charities in #RedCupCheer Christmas campaign](https://fundraising.co.uk/2015/11/09/starbucks-offers-150k-to-charities-in-redcupcheer-christmas-campaign/)**(
   9 November 2015)
 * **[Limited offer finance advice service launches for small charities](https://fundraising.co.uk/2015/12/07/limited-offer-finance-advice-service-launches-small-charities/)**(
   7 December 2015)
 * **[Starbucks supports charities with #RedCupCheer](https://fundraising.co.uk/2015/12/15/starbucks-supports-charities-with-redcupcheer-challenge/)**(
   15 December 2015)
