# Socially connected people more likely to show bias in their giving

- Link: https://fundraising.co.uk/2014/08/20/socially-connected-people-likely-show-bias-giving/
- Published: 2014-08-20T10:32:59+01:00
- Author: Howard Lake

People who consider themselves to be connected socially with other people are more
likely to show bias in their charitable donations, giving larger sums to beneficiaries
who are similar to them.

But people who see themselves as independent, autonomous individuals show no favouritism
or discrimination in their charitable behavior.

The findings are presented in paper published in the [_Journal of Consumer Research_](http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.1086/674976?uid=3738032&uid=2&uid=4&sid=21104543372527)
that explores prosocial acts in the context of ‘self-construal’ – whether people
see themselves as connected with or separate from other people.

## Advertisement

 [⌊Posthub advert. You create the campaign. We'll handle the postal journey. Get started at post-hub.co.uk.⌉](https://fundraising.co.uk/ads/posthub-20261007-300x250/)

The paper finds that ‘interdependent’ people are not more likely to give to charity
than ‘independent’ self-construers. But they are more likely to give to people who
are similar to themselves – a finding the paper’s authors describe as “ironic” –
whereas independents give equally to in-group and out-group.

The paper reported on four studies conducted by the authors – Rod Duclos, of Hong
Kong University of Science and Technology, and Alixandra Barasch of the University
of Pennsylvania.

Two of the results were:

> Caucasian American interdependents were more likely to give to a charity supporting
> tornado victims if white people appeared in the appeal compared, to appeal materials
> that featured black people; whereas Caucasian American independents gave equally
> to appeals showing black and white victims.

> Chinese interdependents were more likely to give to victims of an earthquake in
> Sichuan rather than Haiti; whereas there was no bias in the giving patterns of
> Chinese independents.

Duclos and Barasch explain their findings in terms of the happiness that giving 
to charity brings people. Interdependents gain greater happiness from helping people
like themselves. However, because independents already see themselves as separate
from others, in-groups and out-groups have lower relevance for them, so giving to
an out-group brings as much happiness as helping the in-group.

The authors note the “irony” of interdependents’ generosity being “driven by somewhat
selfish or self-serving motives”.

For more detailed analysis, see Rogare’s [Critical Fundraising blog](http://blogs.plymouth.ac.uk/criticalfundraising/2014/08/19/knowledge-interdependent-self-construal-leads-to-biased-giving-to-help-in-groups/%20).

 * **[New guidance from Institute of Fundraising on treating donors fairly](https://fundraising.co.uk/2014/12/02/new-guidance-institute-fundraising-treating-donors-fairly/)**(
   2 December 2014)
 * **[You have just six minutes to defend or redefine fundraising. What would you say?](https://fundraising.co.uk/2015/09/07/you-have-just-six-minutes-to-defend-or-redefine-fundraising-what-would-you-say/)**(
   7 September 2015)
 * **[Donor rights a priority but infrastructure an issue says study](https://fundraising.co.uk/2016/02/04/donor-rights-a-priority-but-lack-of-infrastructure-an-issue-says-charity-study/)**(
   4 February 2016)