# It’s shocking: how we use imagery in fundraising

- Link: https://fundraising.co.uk/2012/08/10/its-shocking-how-we-use-imagery-fundraising/
- Published: 2012-08-10T11:26:42+01:00
- Author: Howard Lake

The debate about the use of allegedly shocking imagery in fundraising is not new.
I realised

recently that it’s almost 20 years since I gave a plenary presentation at the Institute
of Fundraising

Convention entitled: The Truth, The Whole Truth, and A Spot of Re-Touching.

## Advertisement

The ‘shocking advertising’ debate opened up again recently with the publication 
of an ASA report,

which sparked many a misleading headline including: ‘Shocking Charity Images Upset
Many’.

The reality behind the headline is that 16% of people said they had been offended
in the past year.

So, hold the front page: SHOCKING AND INACCURATE HEADLINE GETS ATTENTION FOR RESEARCH
INTO, ER, SHOCKING AND INACCURATE USE OF IMAGES…

Let’s set aside the fact that this all seems like wilful misinterpretation, and 
yet another example of

what I call ‘Research Abuse’ that seems almost endemic in the fundraising world (
remember people,

Qual and Quant research are not the same thing!)… and let’s get to the heart of 
the issues raised.

In simple terms, effective charity fundraising is highly likely to be shocking. 
And that is simply

because our role is to inspire people to support things that need changing.

The problem with too much fundraising is that it is not shocking enough. Sometimes
this is because

issues become sanitised by charity communicators. And sometimes it’s because agencies
and/or

clients become too concerned with being overtly creative. Important causes can end
up looking

like they might win a creative award rather than inspire a response. Such work can
look expensive,

often even when it isn’t. And because too many fundraisers and their agencies dress
up ugly issues

in creative glad rags, too many compelling causes become fictionalised.

I’d argue we should be doing the opposite. As fundraisers and campaigners we have
a duty to tell

the truth and to reveal the need so that people have the opportunity to help. If
we obscure the

need, then we deny people the chance to help. Which is pretty daft when there are
so many wrongs

in the world that need righting.

Getting back to that research, what we reveal can of course be shocking.

• It’s shocking that every day thousands of children shit themselves to death, because
they

have only vile, diseased water to drink.

• It’s shocking that magnificent whales are killed with harpoons that explode inside
their

bodies and make them bleed to death or slowly drown.

• It’s shocking that girls’ and women’s genitals are mutilated – not rarely, but
routinely.

Of course, I’m not making any of this up. Hell, I wish I was. And the point is, 
you don’t have to make

it up, or make it more cleverly attention-grabbing, or camouflage it with nicely
polished branding.

You just have to get the issues in front of people who care. You just need to strip
away all of the

indulgence and extraneous information, and concentrate on the simple, human, emotive,
dramatic,

inspiring truth.

In doing this, we have to edit. We have to choose what to reveal. Because we have
neither the time

nor the space nor the budget to start educating. Inspire and engage, then educate
later.

I wish we could make everyone stop and think about the issues we try to communicate.
But we

can’t. People are busy. They filter stuff out. We all do. So the best we can hope
for is that we can be

disciplined enough, and sometimes brave enough, to unearth and communicate the powerful
heart

of the issues we care about.

Let’s go back to that 16% of people who were offended by charity images. I’d wager
that some of

that 16% were offended and then gave money. Surely many donors give precisely because
they are

offended by a wrong that needs righting?

If fundraising communications are shocking, it’s simply because the world itself
is shocking.

Thanks for reading.

 * **[Two charity technology hack days coming up](https://fundraising.co.uk/2012/08/24/two-charity-technology-hack-days-coming/)**(
   24 August 2012)
 * **[Charity Times publishes iPad edition](https://fundraising.co.uk/2012/09/04/charity-times-publishes-ipad-edition/)**(
   4 September 2012)
 * **[Lessons learned from a fundraising career](https://fundraising.co.uk/2012/10/31/lessons-learned-fundraising-career/)**(
   31 October 2012)
