# British multinationals in politically controversial countries give more to charity

- Link: https://fundraising.co.uk/2009/04/02/british-multinationals-politically-controversial-countries-give-more-charity/
- Published: 2009-04-02T09:20:16+01:00
- Author: Howard Lake

British multinationals that operate in countries that lack basic human rights give
around 70% more money to charity than firms that do not have a presence in such 
politically controversial nations, a new study has revealed.

The findings are reported in the Journal of Management Studies. In ‘Corporate charitable
giving, multinational companies and countries of concern’, Stephen Pavelin, Stephen
J. Brammer, and Lynda A. Porter report that a corporate presence in one or more 
countries in which political rights and civil liberties are curtailed pushed up 
the average level of a company’s donations from £1.148m to £1.977m.

The study looked at the charitable donations of 305 UK plcs, comprising around half
of FTSE All-Share Index companies.

## Advertisement

 [⌊Posthub advert. You create the campaign. We'll handle the postal journey. Get started at post-hub.co.uk.⌉](https://fundraising.co.uk/ads/posthub-20261007-300x250/)

The researchers suggest that this increased philanthropy could be seen as an attempt
to “offset” negative connotations related to the companies’ operations in controversial
countries such as China, Burma, Sudan and the Democratic Republic of Congo.

The study drew information from the companies’ annual reports from 2002 and looked
at presence in ‘countries of concern’, as defined by criteria established by the
FTSE4Good Index – which aims to identify environmentally and socially responsible
companies.

Unable to separate out corporate giving by country, the team could not determine
whether the higher levels of charitable donations were directed towards projects
in the UK or in the host countries themselves.

While political and civil rights issues were shown to stimulate charitable donations,
the level of corruption in a country did not have a similar effect. “It appears 
that the salient feature of a country in this connection is a lack of political 
rights and/or civil liberties, rather than a presence of high levels of corruption,”
said Dr Pavelin.

www.interscience.wiley.com/journal/joms

 * **[Fundraising Law Made Easy](https://fundraising.co.uk/2009/04/07/amazon-327/)**(
   7 April 2009)
 * **[Government is right to fund charity campaigning, ActionAid says](https://fundraising.co.uk/2009/04/08/government-right-fund-charity-campaigning-actionaid-says/)**(
   8 April 2009)
 * **[Charities face big government cuts](https://fundraising.co.uk/2009/04/23/charities-face-big-government-cuts/)**(
   23 April 2009)