# Choosing celebrity patrons. Are Ross and Brand the new Barrymore?

- Link: https://fundraising.co.uk/2008/12/01/choosing-celebrity-patrons-are-ross-and-brand-new-barrymore/
- Published: 2008-12-01T13:03:55+00:00
- Author: Howard Lake

Some celebrities become untouchable. For very different reasons. We won’t hear a
bad word about Michael Palin or Dame Judi Dench. Some people can’t be put off Jeffrey
Archer (‘he’s still a brilliant fundraiser’) or Lester Piggot (‘it was definitely
a stitch-up’). But Jonathan Ross and Russell Brand’s names are currently mud. It
may not last.

 [⌊Borders books pitch in⌉](http://www.flickr.com/photos/iain/2991253439)

Photo: Iain Farrell

But the recent brouhaha goes to show how selecting charity patrons is a job fraught
with difficulties. However there’s plenty of useful information in the public domain
that can help you draw up a properly informed list of potential celebrity patrons.

## Advertisement

 [⌊Posthub advert. You create the campaign. We'll handle the postal journey. Get started at post-hub.co.uk.⌉](https://fundraising.co.uk/ads/posthub-20261007-300x250/)

First step may be selection criteria. Say, relevance, trust and respect.

Relevance is the most flexible of these, even within groups of supporters. E.g. 
what’s relevant to supporters of your challenge events such as sporting prowess 
may be irrelevant to attendees at your summer reception, where people may prefer
to rub shoulders with people whose power rests in wealth rather than hand-to-eye
co-ordination.

Ideally you’d find crossover – Lewis Hamilton anyone?

But it’s early days for him so far as Trust is concerned – something on which you
can’t compromise. In a Reader’s Digest survey the three most trusted celebrities
were Sir David Attenborough, Sir Trevor MacDonald, and Rolf Harris – and what all
the celebrities in the top 10 shared was 20 years or more in the public eye, unblemished.

Equally, who people respect will be driven by their own values. So, in a Daily Telegraph/
YouGov survey, people said they ‘personally took pride in’

Dame Kelly Holmes

The Queen

Lord (Sebastian) Coe

Sir Trevor McDonald

Paula Radcliffe

JK Rowling.

Notice how each person on the list has clearly been chosen for completely different
reasons – otherwise how could The Queen and JK Rowling make the same list? I suspect
the Queen’s there because of the manner in which she conducts her reign. For JK,
surely it’s the single mother made good, dragged herself up by her bootlaces etc.

Hence if your supporters, or those you wish to attract, are Daily Telegraph Readers,
this isn’t a bad place to start. But wherever you start, don’t end up with Michael
Barrymore.

Despite criminal convictions, Jeffrey Archer and Lester Piggott may have recovered
something of their reputations, but even with only a police caution on file, there’s
no way back for Barrymore.

Alastair Irons

Executive Creative Director, www.twcat.co.uk

Chairman of Trustees, www.iprescue.org.uk

Director, www.ourworldoursay.org

 * **[Physician heal thyself](https://fundraising.co.uk/2008/12/01/physician-heal-thyself/)**(
   1 December 2008)
 * **[10 ways to make your direct mail results unbeatable …](https://fundraising.co.uk/2008/12/17/10-ways-make-your-direct-mail-results-unbeatable/)**(
   17 December 2008)
 * **[Perfect presents? Never.](https://fundraising.co.uk/2008/12/24/perfect-presents-never/)**(
   24 December 2008)