# Professionalising the Sector

- Link: https://fundraising.co.uk/2007/02/06/professionalising-sector/
- Published: 2007-02-06T11:37:33+00:00
- Author: Howard Lake

How many years have we all moaned about the lack of good people in the sector? How
the length of time people stay in their fundraising jobs – especially the first 
one – gets shorter and shorter. And anyone who has been a fundraising director knows
just how often keen fresh graduates come knocking on our doors asking for a job 
in fundraising, only to be told that they have no relevant experience.

At the annual Careers Circus that moves from university to university, where is 
the voluntary sector, offering careers in fundraising? What are we doing to create
the truly professional cadre of fundraisers that the sector so desperately needs?

Surely the answer is staring us in the face? One or two charities already offer 
graduate training schemes for fundraisers, but in total these come to no more than
a handful of places. What if the top 50 charities committed themselves to a minimum
of one graduate traineeship a year and the Institute committed itself to promote
the scheme around the universities? We’d have an injection of at least 50 bright
young people into the sector each year, and almost overnight fundraising would be
perceived as a profession to aspire to.

## Advertisement

 [⌊Posthub advert. You create the campaign. We'll handle the postal journey. Get started at post-hub.co.uk.⌉](https://fundraising.co.uk/ads/posthub-20261007-300x250/)

What could such a scheme look like? I would suggest a two year programme where graduates
would be paid, say £18-20,000 per year by the host charity. Over the two years
of the traineeship, they would spend time in each major fundraising area – individuals,
corporates, trusts and community – and they would attend block release training 
in fundraising and management, run by the Institute. At the end of the two years,
they would have membership of the Institute. They could then be offered a full-time
job by their sponsoring charity or would be free to move elsewhere within the sector.

Ah, I hear you cry. So the charities take all the risk and then the bod leaves for
pastures new. How can we justify the expense? Well, for starters, two years is better
than you’re getting out of the average initial jobholder now. Secondly, if you plan
properly, then you should be able to offer those graduates a decent job at the end
of their training. After all, most fundraising departments have staff turnovers 
of at least 25% per year. Thirdly, you’re getting two years’ work out of them at
a reasonably low salary.

So come on, let’s pull our collective fingers out and start really professionalising
the sector. For a very small investment, we could see within five years anything
up to 500 new fully qualified fundraisers in the sector. Now that really could start
to make a difference.

 * **[Earning an income from videos on YouTube gets closer](https://fundraising.co.uk/2007/02/08/earning-income-videos-youtube-gets-closer/)**(
   8 February 2007)
 * **[The year of the fundraising widget (or badge)?](https://fundraising.co.uk/2007/02/08/year-fundraising-widget-or-badge/)**(
   8 February 2007)
 * **[Umbrella organisation criticised again by The Guardian](https://fundraising.co.uk/2007/02/10/umbrella-organisation-criticised-again-guardian/)**(
   10 February 2007)