# Comment on draft Charities Bill by Thomas Eggar's Helen Harvie

- Link: https://fundraising.co.uk/2004/06/02/comment-draft-charities-bill-thomas-eggar039s-helen-harvie/
- Published: 2004-06-02T23:00:00+01:00
- Author: Howard Lake

Helen Harvie from law firm Thomas Eggar’s Charity Group responds to the Draft Charities
Bill.
In line with the Government’s commitment to provide more openness and accountability
in the not-for-profit sector, the long awaited Charities Bill was published last
week. As anticipated, this Bill provides the greatest shake-up in charity law for
the last decade, as well as fundamentally restructuring the Charity Commission.

 

 

## Advertisement

 [⌊Posthub advert. You create the campaign. We'll handle the postal journey. Get started at post-hub.co.uk.⌉](https://fundraising.co.uk/ads/posthub-20261007-300x250/)

There are currently 5,000 new charities registered with the Charity Commission each
year and in excess of 180,000 on the register. The Government and the Charity Commission
are committed to regulating all existing charities more closely and encouraging 
them to merge with other similar charities where appropriate to achieve savings 
from economy of scale. The ultimate objective is to ensure that the person making
a charitable donation is confident in the credibility of any registered charity 
and certain that the majority of that contribution will go towards the charitable
activities of that organisation, rather than to sustaining a poor administration
system.

 

 

Not only does the new Bill expand the range of categories that will now be recognised
when registering new charities, but it also provides the springboard for a fundamental
review of existing charities, particularly those that charge fees.

 

 

**Private schools and hospitals**

 

There have been warning signals for some time that the Government intends to target
fee-paying charities which only cater for a particular sector of the public who 
can afford to pay for their services. Indeed, many independent schools have already
altered their rules for scholarships and bursaries to ensure that they are open 
to all and increasingly means-tested. Private hospitals are even more vulnerable.

 

 

The Bill confirms this intention. Until now, any educational charity was automatically
assumed to be charitable but this will no longer be the case. Both new and existing
charities will have to pass the ‘public benefit’ test. The Government’s background
notes to the draft Bill state that: “Independent schools would have to show that
they provide a public benefit”. Public benefit is not defined in the Bill but means
that the resources of the charity must be open to a sufficiently wide class to be
considered available to the ‘public’.

 

 

Whether and how independent schools may meet this criteria is unclear. The larger
independent schools may be able to provide sufficient access to their facilities
to meet the test, but what about the schools that do not have state-of-the-art facilities?

 

 

What happens if any of these charities lose their charitable status is also worryingly
unclear. The change in tax status might mean that many charities, particularly independent
schools and hospitals, might become financially unviable. However, in the worst 
case scenario, they may not just lose their favourable tax status, but may find 
that the assets of the charity fall to the Charity Commission to determine their
ultimate destination.

 

 

**Restrictions on trading**

 

There had been a suggestion that the Government should relax the restrictions on
trading that currently affect charities. The Bill finally confirms that this will
not happen. No doubt many entrepreneurs and high-street traders will breathe a sigh
of relief that there will be no further encroachment on their existing markets from
incoming charities which already benefit from rates relief.

 

 

**Fundraising**

 

The Bill introduces a new licensing scheme for public collections to be administered
by the local authority, in an attempt to simplify a hugely complex system. Fund-
raising is increasingly under scrutiny. The Government has indicated that it is 
happy for the sector to regulate itself, but if this is not successful it reserves
the right within the Bill to intervene and make statutory regulations.

 

 

**Payment of charity trustees**

 

The not-for-profit sector is completely dependent upon the time, good will and enthusiasm
of its volunteers. Charity trustees may generally only be paid basic expenses, rather
than any form of remuneration for services to the charity. This Bill seeks to rectify
that situation and ensure that, as long as it can be justified on a commercial basis,
there is no reason why acting charity trustees should not receive some form of recompense
for their efforts. Will this open the floodgates to claims by charity trustees and
make the public more reluctant to make donations? Again, the implementation of this
remains to be seen.

 

 

**Relaxing bureaucracy**

 

The Bill contains a series of measures aimed at relaxing some of the bureaucracy
associated with charity law, whilst at the same time ensuring that the Charity Commission,
as a regulatory body, has increased powers of monitoring and intervention. Measures
include making it easier to merge with other charities and to transfer funds, and
to free-up restricted capital for the benefit of the charity. There is also to be
greater protection from liability for both charity trustees and charity auditors
and a much simpler process for incorporating charities will be introduced.

 

 

**Conclusion**

 

Many of these reforms are long awaited and welcomed by the sector in general. However,
there is certainly much unease about the extent of the scope of these reforms and
how they will be implemented in practice. It is anticipated that this Bill will 
become law in early 2005. Some of the measures may be amended but there is no doubt
of the Government’s intention to ensure that charities are brought to account and
made to operate efficiently, transparently and in the public interest. This Bill
ensures that the Charity Commission increasingly has the ‘teeth’ to deal with charities
that do not meet their standards.

 

 

Charity trustees would be well advised to take the next six to nine months to look
very seriously at their constitutions, their activities and their provision of access
to the public. In particular they should review their status in light of the 12 
revised charitable purposes and consider the implications of any potential loss 
of charitable status.

 

 

 

---

 

Helen is a member of Thomas Eggar’s dedicated Charity Group, based in the Chichester
office.

 

 

Thomas Eggar is one of the UK’s largest regional law firms. It provides legal services
to both commercial organisations and private individuals. It has over 250 years 
of experience of looking after wealthy private individuals and family affairs.

 

 

Thomas Eggar has offices situated in Chichester, Horsham, London, Reigate and Worthing.

 

 * **[New editor at Third Sector magazine](https://fundraising.co.uk/2004/06/15/new-editor-third-sector-magazine/)**(
   15 June 2004)
 * **[Keep up to date with new jobs on UK Fundraising](https://fundraising.co.uk/2004/06/16/keep-date-new-jobs-uk-fundraising/)**(
   16 June 2004)
 * **[Two new fundraisers at British Lung Foundation](https://fundraising.co.uk/2004/06/28/two-new-fundraisers-british-lung-foundation/)**(
   28 June 2004)
