# Institute of Fundraising responds to Buse Commission

- Link: https://fundraising.co.uk/2003/11/17/institute-fundraising-responds-buse-commission/
- Published: 2003-11-17T00:00:00+00:00
- Author: Howard Lake

The Institute of Fundraising has launched its outline response to the Buse Commission
on the self-regulation of charity fundraising.
In its response, the Institute argues
that the voluntary sector needs “a simple but structured approach to self-regulation
that builds on the work of the Institute in setting best practice standards over
the last 20 years.”

 

 

## Advertisement

 [⌊Posthub advert. You create the campaign. We'll handle the postal journey. Get started at post-hub.co.uk.⌉](https://fundraising.co.uk/ads/posthub-20261007-300x250/)

The Buse Commission grew out of the Government’s response to the Strategy Unit’s
consultation document ‘Private Action, Public Benefit’, published in 2002. The Government’s
response, entitled ‘Charities and Not-for-profits: A modern legal framework’, suggested
that more formal self-regulation was the next step for the sector, with powers given
to the Home Secretary to introduce statutory regulation if self-regulation fails
to work.

 

 

The Institute of Fundraising says that it does not accept that, as yet, there is
a clear downturn in public confidence affecting the sector. Yet it acknowledges 
that a ‘wait and see’ approach is dangerous if public confidence is to be maintained
or enhanced. Simply gauging public confidence in terms of voluntary income, the 
Institute believes that the sector is unlikely to notice adverse changes quickly
enough to take corrective action in time to stem a decrease in income. Therefore,
argues the Institute, “if there are steps we can take now to maintain or even increase
confidence in the sector, and the cost and burden of such a scheme are balanced 
by the benefit, then we have a duty to take such measures.”

 

 

As a result, the Institute asked Rodney Buse to conduct an independent inquiry into
possible models of self-regulation. He will report in early 2004.

 

 

The Institute’s preferred model is for two separate bodies to oversee self-regulation
in the sector. One body would set standards and engage with fundraising organisations
through membership. The other would act as a reactive arbitrator of complaints about
fundraising practices. The Institute puts itself forward for the former role, with
the latter being handled by a new independent body. The Institute adds that the 
complaints body should be independent of the fundraising community in order to have
the confidence of a complainant and have access to expert opinion from a panel of
fundraising professionals.

 

 

The Institute’s model follows standards set down by The Office for Fair Trading (
OFT) which oversees self-regulatory schemes in other sectors.

 

 

The Institute lays claim to this role by citing its track record in publishing codes
of fundraising practice which have been voluntarily signed up to by fundraising 
organisations.

 

 

The Institute acknowledges that there would need to be “a clear, well-defined and
close relationship between the self-regulatory structure and the regulators, the
Charity Commission and bodies in Scotland and Northern Ireland.” Quite rightly, 
a donor should not be expected to know where regulation stops and self-regulation
starts.

 

 

The Institute of Fundraising would expect the Government to fund the initial marketing
of the new scheme together with ongoing costs of the complaints body.

 

 

The Institute suggests the creation of a mark or symbol which would communicate 
to the public that the organisation has signed up to best practices, in the way 
that reputable travel agencies display the ABTA sign.

 

 * **[Blackwell's choose National Literacy Trust as charity of the year](https://fundraising.co.uk/2003/11/18/blackwell039s-choose-national-literacy-trust-charity-year/)**(
   18 November 2003)
 * **[Diageo publishes first corporate citizenship report](https://fundraising.co.uk/2003/11/22/diageo-publishes-first-corporate-citizenship-report/)**(
   22 November 2003)
 * **[New grants system at the Community Fund](https://fundraising.co.uk/2003/11/24/new-grants-system-community-fund/)**(
   24 November 2003)
