# Database advice

- Link: https://fundraising.co.uk/1998/12/24/database-advice-438/
- Published: 1998-12-24T00:00:00+00:00
- Author: Howard Lake

UK Fundraising welcomes a new columnist this month. Peter Wylie will be writing 
a monthly column on fundraising databases. Peter holds a doctorate in industrial
psychology from Columbia University, and is an expert on how non-profit organisations
can do a far more efficient job of fund raising by carefully mining their donor 
databases.

Read his first column on the issue of US and UK fundraising databases below.
**Database
marketing: UK and US**Dear Dr. Wylie: I’m glad you’re writing a column on database
fundraising, but I’m a little concerned that your experience is unique to North 
America. As you know, there are some pronounced differences between our two countries
despite the fact we speak the same language (more or less). Can you speak to my 
concern.

Dear Concerned: Were I in your shoes, I suspect I might feel very much as you do.
There certainly are big differences between our two cultures and the ways people
do business in them. At the same time, I’m convinced that the principles of database
marketing are equally applicable to fundraising in both our countries primarily 
because of an exceptional book I happened upon a little over a year ago.

## Advertisement

It’s called [Direct and Database Marketing ](http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/0749419601/219)
and it’s written by Graeme McCorkell, a UK citizen who makes his home in Shropshire.
You should read the book and judge for yourself, but I think you’ll find that Mr.
McCorkell offers a number of concepts that those of us in the field of fundraising
can and should be borrowing.

For example, take these three concepts that McCorkell devotes a number of pages 
to:

the lifetime value of a customer

customer share

statistical modeling

Shouldn’t fund raisers be thinking about the lifetime value of their donors? Shouldn’t
we be using our databases to track the long-term value of our donors and to recognize
that value with the non-profit equivalent of frequent flyer miles and free upgrades
to first class.

Shouldn’t fund raisers be thinking about “donor share” the way database marketers
in corporations have come to realize that MARKET share may not be nearly so important
as CUSTOMER share–the portion of a customer’s disposable income they get versus 
what a competitor gets?

Shouldn’t fund raisers be doing the same kind of statistical modeling that profit
making direct marketers do to predict who buys and who doesn’t and who to mail to
three and four times as opposed to just once?

I think McCorkell’s ideas are right on the money for fundraising is the U.S. They
have to be even more on target for fundraising in the U.K. But back to your concern:
I have every intention of making suggestions I offer in future columns as relevant
to BOTH our cultures as I can. But if, for any reason, I miss the mark a bit, please
contact me either through the Web site or by e-mail so I can try to be more responsive
to your questions.

Peter Wylie holds a doctorate in industrial psychology from Columbia University.
He is an expert on how non-profit organizations can do a far more efficient job 
of fund raising by carefully mining their donor databases. His business phone is(
202)332-7571; his e-mail address is [pb********@*ol.com](https://www.fundraising.co.uk/mailto:pb********@*ol.com)

 * **[Entertaining keyword purchase](https://fundraising.co.uk/1999/08/08/entertaining-keyword-purchase/)**(
   8 August 1999)
 * **[eTapestry launches first active service provider fundraising product](https://fundraising.co.uk/1999/08/31/etapestry-launches-first-active-service-provider-fundraising-product/)**(
   31 August 1999)
 * **[British Library becomes free ISP](https://fundraising.co.uk/1999/09/08/british-library-becomes-free-isp/)**(
   8 September 1999)
